|
Articles [NAJP]
Nauseating Is an Adjective
From NAJP-er Michaelangelo Matos comes this link, which really is
worth a click, believe me:
http://lizcolville.tumblr.com/post/668650389/id-like-to-report-a-thousand-thefts
Just in case you didn't, let me summarize. The link is to the
Veraville blog of a writer named Liz Colville, with whom I am
unfamiliar. It concerns a site called ShowBizCafe.com that from what I
can see specializes in movies despite its all-encompassing name. Has
an Alexa rank of around 187,000, which Colville says is pretty good (a
relativity of scale worth noting--comments appreciated). "Churns out"
lots of original content. Hotsy totsy.
Only actually, Colville goes on, maybe not:
Yes, there is original content written by a small staff, but these
articles are boosted by a prominent and frequently updated news
section featuring articles cut and pasted from dozens of reputable
publications--BlackBook, the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times,
Paste Magazine, AFP, and, most frequently, The Hollywood Reporter--to
name just a few I uncovered in the first two pages of an 18-page news
archive. Not only are the publications not cited, but ShowBizCafe
lists the byline as someone named "Mack Chico" (a pun on the CEO's
name, Jack Rico, perhaps?) At the bottom of each article is this
charming phrase: "Source: ShowBizCafe.com."
There's more--told you it was worth clicking. Need I go on at any
length about how appalling this is? James Fallows is writing about it,
for Chrissake. Website feasting off the ever-diminishing store of good
writing that increasingly cash-strapped traditional publications are
subsidizing, can't go on, etc.--with the added fillip that these
creeps aren't even acknowledging the sources, or authors.
What I do have to add to the hue and cry is this. I went to the
site and found a piece by the above-mentioned Jack Rico, who since
Matos brought Colville's post to my attention has offered her a rather
unconvincing apology/explanation. Here is his first graf. I thought I
might just rewrite it, then decided it would be more poetic to do one
of those bracketed all-caps edits that came in with online
publishing. I hate 'em myself.
I had the chance to see the heavily anticipated screening of 'Sex
and the City 2' a few days before its release in theaters
nationwide. [PERHAPS OPTIMISTICALLY, WE ASSUME YOU SAW THE MOVIE
BECAUSE YOU'RE WRITING ABOUT IT. EXACTLY WHEN IS IRRELEVANT. DELETE
SENTENCE.] Just so you know [PROBABLY UNNECESSARY EVEN IF YOU WANT A
CHATTY TONE], I am [I'VE BEEN] a fan of the show [SEX AND THE CITY]
since its pilot debut [DEBUTED] on HBO in the summer of 1998 when
[1998, BACK WHEN] the characters used to talk to the camera and men
were bashing women [COULD BE WITTIER, ALSO CLEARER]. Since then, I've
been hooked and have followed [HOOKED, FOLLOWING] our four voyagers
through the ups and downs of their lives [THEIR UPS AND DOWNS]- which
is why the two SATC movies have crushed my expectations of what could
have been [HOW 'BOUT: FOR A FAN LIKE ME, THE TWO SATC MOVIES HAVE BEEN
SOUL-CRUSHING DISILLUSIONMENTS. AT LEAST IT PARSES.] - and am
nauseating at a possible third installment. ["NAUSEATING AT" IS NOT
IDIOMATIC ENGLISH. HOW 'BOUT: THE THOUGHT OF A THIRD INSTALLMENT MAKES
ME RETCH.]
And this clown is the site's star.
Articles, June 6, 2010
 |
Book Publishing Made Easy, 144 Characters at a Time |
The Return of Deems Taylor |
 |
|